This Blog is intended for educational and informational purposes only. Some posters are court ordered to have no contact of any kind with the person having a Restraining Order against them. Meaning no third party contact as well. If you by chance know a person one of our posters/authors is discussing to share their experiences with others, we ask you to respect our rights to free speech, under the United States Constitution. Restraining Order Blog is not meant to harass, directly or indirectly contact, harm, intimidate, bring any emotional distress, stalk or cyberstalk, nor intentionally slander or damage any individual in any way. Nor is it intended to initiate any third party contact on behalf of any poster or author, or violate a current restraining order in any way either. If you feel there is anything here that is slanderous, untrue, or illegal, please bring it to our attention. We will examine your request promptly, and any post you find offensive will be reviewed for removal in a timely manner. If you have a story to share, email me at ka7niq@yahoo.com, and I will add you as an author on Restraining Order Blog.












12/09/2009

Restraining Order Ruling Will Curb False Claims

 Restraining Order Ruling Will Curb False Claims

This is a great restraining order article from our good friends at http://www.glennsacks.com/



By Mike McCormick and Glenn Sacks



Mary Ellen Schoonmaker’s recent column "I'm sure you didn't intend to hurt her" (7/17/08) criticizes a controversial new New Jersey court ruling which raises the burden of proof for domestic violence restraining orders. Schoonmaker says the ruling will cost abused women “time…that could save lives” and laments “Anyone who thought New Jersey's progress in protecting women against domestic violence was safe should think again.”



Schoonmaker is correct to be concerned about protecting abused women, but she misunderstands certain aspects of the restraining order issue.



Under current law, it is very easy for a woman (or sometimes a man) to allege domestic violence and get a restraining order. The standard is “preponderance of the evidence” (often conceptualized as 51%-49%), and judges almost always side with the accusing plaintiff.



Under New Jersey’s Domestic Violence Prevention Act, the accuser need not even claim actual abuse. Alleged verbal threats of violence are sufficient, even though it’s almost impossible for the accused to provide substantive contradictory evidence.



The order boots the man out of his own home and generally prohibits him from contacting his own children. In recognition of the gravity of these orders, the new decision holds the current standard of proof unconstitutional and requires the stricter “clear and convincing evidence” standard.



To Schoonmaker’s credit, unlike many advocates of easy access to restraining orders, she does recognize that the orders are sometimes misused. There is a large body of evidence to support this contention.



For example, the Family Law News, the official publication of the State Bar of California Family Law Section, recently explained:



“Protective orders are increasingly being used in family law cases to help one side jockey for an advantage in child custody…[they are] almost routinely issued by the court in family law proceedings even when there is relatively meager evidence and usually without notice to the restrained person....it is troubling that they appear to be sought more and more frequently for retaliation and litigation purposes.”



An article in the November, 2007 issue of the Illinois Bar Journal explains:



"If a parent is willing to abuse the system, it is unlikely the trial court could discover (his or her) improper motives in an Order of Protection hearing."



These orders have become so commonplace that the Illinois Bar Journal calls them "part of the gamesmanship of divorce.”



The orders are sometimes ludicrously easy to get. For example, in 2006 a New Mexico woman even got one against New York TV host David Letterman. She claimed he was inflicting “mental cruelty" and "sleep deprivation" on her--via his TV broadcasts from 3,000 miles away! Typifying many, the Letterman judge explained, "If [applicants] make a proper pleading, then I grant it," as if what matters is not the accused’s guilt or innocence, but instead whether the accuser knows how to fill out a form properly.



Family law attorney Bruce Pitman, who often litigates domestic violence restraining order cases in Bergen County, says:



“Anybody who practices family law sees people who abuse the restraining order process. Some create false allegations or take minor or insignificant acts and use them to remove their spouse or partner from the home for advantage in litigation. Such abuses undermine victims of real abuse and violence who seek protection.”



Schoonmaker cites the 1991 Kathleen Quagliani case as an example of a woman who could have been saved. Just a few weeks before New Jersey passed the DVPA making it easier to obtain restraining orders, Quagliani had been denied a proper order. A week later Quagliani was murdered by her husband. But would a restraining order have really saved her life?



A restraining order is only enforceable against a law-abiding man--a violent spouse intent on killing his ex is not going to obey it. Quagliani’s husband beat her to death with a baseball bat in front of their child—would he really have been deterred from doing so out of fear of violating his restraining order?



Restraining orders have become a weapon used for advantage in divorce and child custody litigation, effectively giving women the right to banish men from their homes and their children whenever they see fit. It is entirely appropriate that New Jersey require substantive evidence of abuse before granting them.







Mike McCormick is the Executive Director of the American Coalition for Fathers and Children. Their website is www.acfc.org.



Glenn Sacks’ columns on men's and fathers' issues have appeared in dozens of the largest newspapers in the United States. He invites readers to visit his website at http://www.glennsacks.com/

Restraining Order Blog is not meant to harass, directly or indirectly contact, harm, imtimidate, bring any emotional distress, stalk or cyberstalk, nor intentionally slander or damage any individual in any way.
Nor is it intended to initiate any third party contact on behalf of any poster or author, or violate a current restraining order in any way. If you feel there is anything on our Restraining Order Blog that is slanderous, untrue, or illegal, please bring it to our attention. Our Restraining Order Blog Legal Staff will examine your request promptly, and any post you find offensive will be reviewed and possibly removed in a timely mannner

4 comments:

  1. What does one do when you have the proof in hand of false alegations to recieve a RO in a Divorce? This thing is being used as a weapon against me.. I have done nothing.. My last RO violation asking the wife to "please stop harassing me" In an e-mail where we have permission to e-mail about childrens visits. a detective found enough evidence with the e-mail to charge her with criminal harassment then a month later the wife goes down and complains and i get charged with a violation for the same e-mail.. What a joke of the system my wife is playing it to the best of her ability..

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unfortunately, all they have to claim is Fear, and find a sympathetic judge to get a restraining order here in Tampa. Women are well coached by lawyers to play the system to their advantage in a divorce.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Restraining orders are easy to get and anyone can receive them. Sleep with the person and cry abuse, then run to another state. You don't need proof. Something has to change. Judges ignore evidence that shows the man innocent these days and women get away with lying. I support womens rights and I'm a woman but this is a disgrace. People who use restraining orders like this harm those who need help. There needs to be proof of injury and unbiased judges.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is all about Politics when dealing with restraining orders. Many Judges here in Tampa are not protecting the woman, they are protecting themselves! Tampa Judges hand out restraining orders like candy. The rights of the accused are thrown out the window, for the Judges Political career. To not issue a restraining order in tampa could be political suicide if the Man really hurts the woman. The Tampa newspapers and womens rights groups will have a field day with the Judge if that should happen. So, to protect their own ass, judges in tampa issue almost every restraining order that is asked for.

    ReplyDelete